顯示包含「第三隻眼睛」標籤的文章。顯示所有文章
顯示包含「第三隻眼睛」標籤的文章。顯示所有文章

2016年8月11日星期四

The Mystery of Centre-weighted Metering: Disassembling Nikon F Photomic TN Finder

The Nikon F Photomic TN finder (1967-1968) is the successor of the Photomic T finder (1965-1967). With 'N' stands for 'new', the TN finder differs in appearance from the T finder only by an extra white button on top of the front plate and a white character 'N' imprinted on the top cover near the meter switch. That extra button serves to allow the user to test the battery. Provided that the meter is switched on, if the battery is working (not used up), the meter needle will deflect once the button is pushed. This is a pretty good improvement.


While the T finder merely provides whole-field-averaged metering, a seeming more advanced feature of the TN finder is the centre-weighted metering, with the central part of the view corresponding to a circle of 12 mm in diameter on the film weighted 60% and the surrounding part 40%.

Centre-weighted metering sounds sophisticated. I have been hard-grasped by the curiosity of how it works. So, I sought to buy a TN finder, one with lots of scratches and a few dents, at a reasonably low price for disassembling in order to find out the answer. Out of my surprise, it is not that hi-tech as I thought. There is no complicated electronics. Instead, centre-weighting is achieved geometric-optically by a small hole of suitable size that limits [and diffracts?] light onto each of the two photo-resistors.



Each of the photo-resistors seems to be covered by a convex lens.

For a brief visual comparison of the TN finder with the T finder, please see also the previous post Disassembling Nikon F Photomic T Finder.

2016年3月27日星期日

Disassembling Nikon F Photomic T Finder

I recently bought a Nikon F with Photomic T finder. The condition of the body is good but the meter was dead.  With fresh battery, the meter showed no response to light. (I just used two L1560 alkaline cells, each 1.5V, to substitute the original requirement of two PX625 mercury cells, each 1.35V.  The over-applied voltage would result in the light meter showing higher-than-actual values.  But my primary goal was to restore the workability of the meter.  It was extraneous to talk about precision at this stage.) Besides, the aperture coupling lever was jammed. I tried to fix the problems on my own.


The optical compartment, with prism and eyepiece, can be separated from the upper part of the finder by unscrewing four screws (not identical).

It is remarkable that Nikon achieved through-the-lens (TTL) metering firstly in its Photomic T finder, as this one, in 1965. By disassembling the optical compartment, you can "unearth" this 50-year-old technology that laid the milestone of Nikon's technology advancement. Besides, [analogue] electronic products were high-class at that time, and PCB was cutting-edge technology. Inside this Photomic T finder, there is a small printed circuit board (PCB) placed on top of the optical compartment. (PCB had not been used in its predecessor, Photomic finder). Note that the two electrical connection points (holes) on the PCB are made to contact with the two wires in the upper part of the finder. That PCB can be taken out very easily by unscrewing one more screw.  When I lift up the PCB, a brass washer dropped out (next to the big screw in the photo below) and I failed to recognize where it was originally placed.  I just skipped it and everything went fine!

There are only four electronic components on that PCB, namely a fixed resistor (150 ohm), two photo-resistors and a variable resistor. The fixed resistor is in series with the latter three connected in parallel. As the electrical resistance of the photo-resistors decreases with light intensity, the overall electrical resistance of the whole electrical path on the PCB drops.

The two photo-resistors are fitted into two holes (with lens?) underneath through which they receive light.

With screw drivers, big and small, you can thoroughly explore how Nikon achieved TTL 50 years ago. All you need to do is further unscrewing [with due care]...

The key to TTL is two triangular prisms appended to the main pentaprism which diverge light onto the two photo-resistors. Appended to the other side of the pentaprism is a trapezoidal-cylindrical piece of glass that, together with a front-surface mirror placed underneath, serves to enable the needle of the meter be seen (above the image of the object) through the eye piece. Now, all the optical surfaces, except the inner face of the eye piece glass, can be cleaned easily. The inner face of the eye piece glass is still not accessible as that piece of glass is masked by a metal hood "permanently" affixed to the prism holder by two nails (not screws).

Back to the upper part of the finder. The wiring to the battery room seemed not good. With a multimeter, the path from this point to the connector to the PCB was found non-conducting even the switch was "ON". The black wire even fell off completely (two ends of the wire) as I applied a small force on it. The other end of that wire should be connected to the switch. The wire had to be re-soldered.

Before doing that, I decided to check the whole circuit. Parts of the circuit are hidden under the top metal case. To lift off the top case, it is required to peel off the piece of leatherette on top of the finder. I needed to do it very carefully to avoid damage. Four screws were uncovered then.

The top metal case can be lifted off as the four screws are unscrewed. The electrical circuit became clearly traceable once the top metal case was removed.

A circuit diagram has been drawn, as follow:

Before proceeding to the difficult part, I attempted to fix the jammed aperture coupling lever first. Having the name plate removed by unscrewing three screws (one at the top side and two at the bottom side of the name plate) and then two more at each sides of a metal strip, all moving parts can be separated.

The problem was due to dirt in the slot fitting the up-and-down moving part and stiffness of the spring. The slot was cleaned and the spring stretched to restore, to a certain extent, to workable condition. I have reservation on using WD40 as it would be sticky to dust.


Now, back to the electrical part. Re-soldering the wire connecting the battery room and the switch was a bit difficult because the contact to the switch could only be reached after the ring resistor had been loosen to let out some space. To move out the ring resistor, the meter head also needs to be loosen. Before loosing the ring resistor, be reminded to use a marker pen to mark the relative position of ring resistor and the gear wheels of the shutter coupling knob such that they can be resumed to the same relative position. I found the black wire connecting the battery room (negative pole) and the switch seriously oxidized. So, I decided to replace it.

All I could found at home useful for this purpose was a dummy telephone cord which composes of four thin wires. I cut out a short segment of a wire (yellow color) for use as replacement for the black wire and re-soldered the contact to the battery room and the switch.

I used a multimeter to check the path from the negative pole of the battery to the connection point to the PCB with black wire and found it all right. I also checked the electrical resistance across the  connection point to the PCB with a red wire and the earth (the contact point of another red wire to the case). In the process, the meter needle flickered. (To measure electrical resistance across two points, the multimeter sends through a small current and measures the voltage drops.  Part of this current just branched through the meter head (the remains branched through the ring resistor), causing its needle to deflect). It means that the meter head was not dead. I turned the ring resistor and found the resistance varied also. Things seemed to be in order.

I took the opportunity to clean the inner side of the ring resistor using cotton buds soaked with alcohol as I learnt people on the Internet saying that bad contact would result in the meter being jumpy. It was so unfortunate that a strip of metal came off during the cleansing process. I later noted that half of the inner side of the the ring resistor was coated with carbon and the other half was covered by that metal strip. Due to different electrical resistance of carbon and the metal, the overall resistance of the ring resistor varies as the two moving contacts (one associated with aperture/ASA and the other with shutter speed) take different positions on the carbon coating and the metal surface. Eventually, I re-attached the metal strip back to more or less the original position on the inner side of the ring resistor with glue.

There is a variable resistor on top of the finder (under the top metal case). It should be used to calibrate the meter. I tried to have the all necessary parts reassembled to test the meter's response to light. The finder has to be equipped onto he camera body with a lens as it is how TTL metering works. It is necessary to "input" the maximum aperture of the lens to the finder through the ASA selection dial. What I have tried was to make measurements with a "light meter" app in iPhone and set the aperture/ASA/shutter combinations to the finder, then adjusted the variable resistor to make the meter needle to point to "O". It was so frustrating that although I successfully adjusted the variable resistor to make the needle pointing to "O" at a combination, the needle was off from "O" again when I changed to another combination under the same illumination. I guess it was the conducting surfaces (carbon/metal) of the ring resistor having uneven electrical resistance, probably due to ageing (erosion or oxidation). The precision of this meter could hardly be restored unless the ring resistor is replaced, I think.

Before putting the metal top case back, segments of cellulose tape (insulating) was affixed to avoid short-circuit.

For the sake of convenience of further repairing in the future, I decided not to have the leatherette re-glued.

2015年10月31日星期六

A solution to film jam problem in Polaroid Land 100 series camera

Polaroid Land 100 series camera uses pack film. Polaroid does not produce pack film any more and old stocks could hardly be found in the marketplace.

Fortunately, the pack films produced by FujiFilm, such as FP-3000B (discontinued not very long ago) and FP-100C, are compatible for use.

The catch is that instead of a metal case as Polariod film, the case for Fuji pack film is made of plastic that can easily be compressed to deform by the metallic V-shape spring inside the film chamber. And, as the plastic case is compressed, due to the increased friction, a film could easily be jammed inside or half way out when it is pulled out from the side door of the film chamber after exposure.



Some people proposed to permanently flatten out the V-shape spring or even remove it. I personally do not like solutions which are destructive. The best solution that I have got so far is to use two hair pins in the way as shown in the second photo below. In this way, the V-shape spring is depressed such that the pressure onto the plastic case for the pack film is relieved. This quick and low-cost solution is not only extremely effective but also non-destructive.

2014年3月16日星期日

第三隻眼睛 ── Rollei 35

"Full frame palm sized" ── 它才是始祖。為了將 135 相機小型化,設計師無所不用其極,搞出這部 Rollei 35。它曾經是世上體積最小的 135 菲林相機,1966 年面世,原產地是德國﹝西德﹞。Wikipedia【Rollei 35】對它的歷史有詳細記載,在此不贅。

現在仍有很多人對 Rollei 35 趨之若鶩,因為它出於名門,外型獨特不在話下,而且可拍出高質素的照片。由於多人追捧,價格居高不下,品相好的動輒賣兩千多元,而且還只是新加坡製的,德國貨更貴兩三成。

初時我沒有意思想擁有一部,主要是因為我對對焦要靠估距離有點抗拒,而且它的外殼十分單薄,角位很容易撞凹﹝很多街貨都是凹了角的﹞,稍為大力擠壓也會變形。無論從實用角度或玩的角度看,兩三千元大有更好的選擇。直至有一次見到這部外觀蠻好的新加坡貨只賣千七,又是我喜歡的銀色,便買了;之後越看越喜歡它那份簡潔美。它配備 Carl Zeiss 製的天蔡﹝Tessar﹞鏡頭,在新加坡貨當中是最早期的,算少有﹝後期的鏡頭由 Rollei 自行製造,鏡頭前面的印字是不同的﹞,焦距 40 毫米,光圈 3.5 至 22,最近對焦距離 3 呎;Compur 快門,速度1/500 至 2 秒,另有 B 門;內置 CdS 測光﹝非 TTL﹞,ISO 25 至 1600 。

不拍照的時候鏡頭可收進機身,拍的時候拉出來,拉盡後要順時鐘方向轉至「咔」一聲。鏡頭兩邊各有一個轉盤,一個較光圈﹝圖左﹞,一個較快門﹝圖右﹞。光圈轉盤上面另有一層用來設定 ISO 值;快門轉盤上面也有一層可讓用者記住菲林種類。調較快門時要將快門轉盤下方的金屬片向上推,同時轉動轉盤。觀景器在快門轉盤上方﹝圖右上﹞,透過觀景器可看見框線,其中兩條邊內側有較短的刻度,框內另有一個成直角的小丫,構成一個較小的框,那是供拍攝距離短於 5 呎時用的;測光錶的感光元件就在左上方的孔裏,測光時要避免手指擋住進光孔。

機頂十分簡潔。左面的是過片杆;中間那個窗用來看測光錶的指針,未入電池只看得見橙色有圈的針,這枝針與光圈、快門及 ISO 值連動,顯示測光量的針是白色的﹝下面有更清楚的說明﹞;右面是快門釋放鈕;前面另有一個按鈕,將鏡頭收回機身時要按住它,同時將鏡頭向逆時鐘方向轉﹝面向相機正面時而言﹞,但記得事前要先過片,否則鏡頭是轉不動的,故此拍完最後一格菲林之後鏡頭有可能收不回。從這個角度亦可清楚看到快門﹝左﹞及光圈﹝右﹞設定轉盤上的刻度;鏡頭前端頂部有距離尺及景深尺,單位為呎﹝刻有 "feet"﹞。

鏡頭前端底部有另一把距離尺及景深尺,單位為米﹝刻有 "m" 字﹞。熱靴座在機底,閃燈要倒轉裝,裝了閃燈便頂住機底中間的三腳架接孔,相機便不能接上三腳架。後面扇形的窗是「計片器」,顯示拍了幾多張菲林,裝上腳架後亦休想可以看得見。另一邊是回片杆,回片時要將回片杆反出來,並將下部凸出來的地方扣在啞鈴形轉子凹陷的位置,然後攪動回片杆。我這部買回來的時候回片杆彎了,不反出來時也會在不知不覺間扣住轉子,過片時轉子應要轉動,被扣住不能動的結果是過不了片,假如未發覺不妥仍用力撥過片杆便會「掃片孔」,第一卷試片便是這樣報廢了。後來我用鉗子將彎了的回片杆拗直,便回復正常了。

相機的背面清楚註明產地是新加坡﹝"MADE BY Rollei  SINGAPORE"﹞,機底對住 "SINGAPORE" 字樣是鎖住機底的栓。聽聞這個栓德國製的與新加坡製的也不一樣。觀景器右邊有一個把手,回片時要先將這個把手向上撥﹝"R" 箭頭指向﹞。至於中間的圓形凸起物,我就不知有什麼用了。

裝取菲林時要先撥開機底的栓,然後將機底向下滑出,再將鏡頭後面的膠板拉低。機底滑出時「計片器」會自動重設﹝回到紅色箭頭的位置﹞。將機底的那部分拿上手便體會到這部機的外殼是何等單薄。

相信 PX625 是沒有希望買到的了,我用 PX625A 代替,電壓是 1.5V,比 PX625 的 1.35V 高些少。嚴格來說電壓不準會令測光錶的讀數有偏差,但始終不是 TTL 測光,大概只能當參考,測光錶的指向些微改變影響可能更大。以負片的寬容度,我想可以放心用,我影了兩卷負片也未試過有一張離譜。放電池的地方在放菲林的地方上面,影了半卷菲林電池用完也不能換。測光錶是沒有開關制的,電池放了進去,無論你是否要拍照,它也會不斷消耗。為了減少耗電,我盡量會將電池拿出來,但一卷菲林未影完,想拿出來都不可以。曾聽過一個說法,指將相機置於漆黑的地方,測光錶便不會耗電。我估那說法是基於理論上 CdS 光敏電阻在沒有光的情況下電阻會變得相當大,近乎是絕緣體,便沒電流通過;但整個電路有沒有其他耗電機制就不得而知了。在無法拿出電池的情況下,亦不妨一試。

裝好電池之後,測光錶的白色指針便動起來。調較光圈或快門時有紅圈的指針便會動,與白針重疊時表示那光圈-快門-ISO 組合會達至適度曝光,簡單易明但不好用,因為指針在機頂的小窗裏,透過觀景器是看不到的,要看到機頂必然要將部機拿下至較低位置,這時測光錶進光孔的指向便容易偏離目標物,測光當然難以準確。

原裝的相機袋很貴,品相一般的都賣成兩百元。幸好我在無印良品找到個 good fit 的啡色小布袋,六十元有找。原裝袋的一側開了孔,相機放進袋裏仍可讓繫着機身的繩穿出來,要影相時拿出相機,機袋仍可繫在繩上,相當方便;但我嫌那個孔入塵,比起原裝那個我更喜歡這個價廉物美的小布袋。

我仍未找到鏡頭蓋,想買個原廠的;我又擔心有了鏡頭蓋之後在拍照時會忘記除掉,因為透過觀景器望出去是察覺不到鏡頭蓋未除的。

天蔡擁百年鷹眼之美譽,拍出來的影像果然銳利﹝照片見於 http://julijulijulian.blogspot.hk/2014/02/2014.html﹞;可是這部機用起來實在諸多不便 ── 對我這個用慣日本單鏡反光機的人而言便是這份感覺。

2013年3月2日星期六

第三隻眼睛 ── Zenit Helios M44-4 58mm F2

曾經擁有一顆人稱「八羽怪」的 Zenit Helios M44 鏡頭,焦距 58 毫米,最大光圈 F2,接環是 M42,玩了一段日子,感覺膩了,便轉贈了他人,連它的容貌也沒有拍下;回想起來,覺得它仍是值得一提的。

聽聞 「八羽怪」是前蘇聯的光學工廠參照東德蔡司的 Biotar 生產出來的「A 貨」,但所謂「標頭無弱旅」,更何況是舉世知名的雙高斯結構,即使是「A 貨」,差極都應該有個譜。

據我所知「八羽怪」有七代,生產期自上世紀五十年代末至九十年代初。我那顆是產於八十年代的第四代﹝M44-4﹞,三年前在二手市場以四百五十港元買入,雖是一顆在世將近三十年的老鏡,但外表簇新,一點花痕也沒有。它有塗了黑漆的金屬鏡身,重甸甸的,拿上手仍不覺太冷,對焦環轉起來有很重的黏滯感。

「八羽怪」在二手市場買賣活躍,它受追捧的原因是它在某些情況下會拍出「旋轉散景」,那本來是個決陷,但偏偏有人﹝包括我自己﹞覺得特別而買來玩,故可以說它的賣點不是質素好,反而是質素差。尤其是第二代﹝M44-2﹞,據聞「旋轉散景」是七代之中最強的,所以最賣得。

以下是 Zenit Helios M44-4 經有矯正鏡片的 M42-Nikon F 轉接環栽在 Nikon D5000 機身上拍出來的照:

在透過雲層的漫射日光之下,收光圈拍,表現不過不失,變形亦不明顯。

再來一張近的,成像相當銳利。

陽光照射的葉子,拍出來葉面泛起一層光暈。

這張泛光更為明顯,但拍出來的花毫無立體感。

散景二線性相當強,看得令人頭暈眼花。

旋轉散景出現了,相信用全片幅相機來拍效果會更為顯著。

開盡光圈,反差變得很低,出現「霧化」。